Skip to main content

Xmas or Christmas?

During this time of year a lot of folks get hung up on the use of the term "Xmas." Most think of it as the world trying to take Christ out of Christmas. I can fully understand their reasoning for it surely looks to be so. And to be sure, for some it is so. We are living at a time in history when the news media and most government and public sectors would like to see Jesus completely eradicated. But this is just a pipe-dream for them because it will never be. You may take Jesus out of the public eye but you cannot remove Jesus from the heart. The question is, "Is it ok to use "Xmas" in place of Christmas. Theologically, linguistically,  and historically the answer is yes. I have always known the "X" to stand for the Greek letter "Chi". Chi is the first letter of the name of Christ in the Greek language which is the language that most of the New testament was written in. The early church used this widely when they scribbled symbols on walls and in caves leaving a witness of their early first century presence. A very good example is the Greek word "Icthus" which means "Fish". Since Christ called His followers "Fishers of Men" it is easy to see why this had so much meaning. But it even goes deeper than just the symbol of the fish. The word "ICHTHUS" in Greek is "ΙΧΘΥΣ" the same word you see on millions of bumper stickers and placards on automobiles. It is what we call an acronym. Each letter as a special meaning: Iesous (I-Iota), Christos (X-Chi), Theou (Θ-Theta), Uios (Î¥-Upsilon), and Sotor (Σ-Sigma). This translates to Jesus the Christ, God's Son, our Savior!!


For some reason we do not care if Christ is represented by "X-Chi" in the Fish Symbol but we get all riled up when it is used in "Xmas". I say let the secularists, atheists, modernists, liberals, and progressives use it! Inadvertently, and most likely unknowingly, they are still associating Christ's name with the "Holy Day" or holiday.

Another use of the letter "X" is it's symbolism for the cross. Christ died on the cross for the sins of mankind. So using the "X" was also of great import to early believers as well as believers today. Most all churches around the world have a Cross somewhere on or in the building. And many Christians don it around their necks as a symbol of their faith. For more on this see the history below.

On the flip side of the coin, as a Christian, I also must be aware of those who do not know the above reason for using "X" or "Chi" for Christ's name. Therefore, because they do not know it I prefer to never use it. But if I see it I am never offended, I just say "Merry Christmas to you as well!" 

For some early history David Capes writes the following on the "Hear the Voice Blog," titled Xmas: is it taking Christ out of Christmas? 

Early Christians developed their own way of signaling respect for the names and titles associated with God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit.  Copying the New Testament books in Greek, they abbreviated the names (usually first letter and last letter) and placed a line above those letters. You can see this in the picture.  Scholars refer to these as nomina sacra (Latin for “sacred names”).  Copyists continued to write sacred names this way for centuries.  It remains a common practice still among artists who create the icons used in the eastern churches.  Many names and titles were written this way including “God,” “Father,” “Jesus,” “Son of God,” “Son of Man,” “Christ,” “Lord,” “Holy Spirit.” For our purposes note the nomina sacra for “Christ;” it was written XC. Now remember these are letters from the Greek alphabet not our Latinized version. It is not “X” (eks) the 24th letter of our English alphabet but the Greek letter “Chi,” the first letter of the title “Christ.”

Earliest versions of writing Christmas as “Xmas” in English go back to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (about 1100).  This predates the rise of secularism by over 600 years.  The Oxford English Dictionary cites the use of “X-“ for “Christ” as early as 1485.  In one manuscript (1551) Christmas is written as “X’temmas.”  English writers from Lord Byron (1811) to Samuel Coleridge (1801) to Lewis Carroll (1864) used the spelling we are familiar with today, “Xmas.”

The origin of “Xmas” does not lie in secularists who are trying to take Christ out of Christmas, but in ancient scribal practices adopted to safeguard the divine name and signal respect for it.  The “X” in “Xmas” is not the English letter (eks) as in “X marks the spot,” but it is the initial Greek letter of the title “Christ."

For some history of the cross see BAR issue Nov/Dec 1979 -Crosses in the Dead Sea Scrolls: A Waystation on the Road to the Christian Cross -Jack Finegan.

He wrote: "These are the first letters of the Greek words When alphabets were invented in about 1700 B.C., a variety of signs were devised to signify different letters. The cross-mark naturally lent itself for this purpose. It is found in alphabets used to write a number of ancient languages, including Canaanite, Phoenician, Aramaic, and Hebrew. In proto-Sinaitic inscriptions at Serabit el-Khadem in the Sinai Desert, the sign is written as +; in a Phoenician inscription at Byblos it is written as X. In ancient Hebrew (prior to the adoption of the square Arabic characters still used today) the last letter of the alphabet was written interchangeably as + or X. The Hebrew name of this letter—Taw (pronounced Tov) may also be translated as the Hebrew word for “mark.”3 Job, in lamenting his woes, exclaims, “Here is my mark, let the Almighty answer me.”

The Semitic name Taw became Tau in the Greek alphabet and “T” in the Latin alphabet. But as the last character in the Hebrew alphabet, the Semitic Taw was sometimes considered the equivalent of Omega, the last letter in the Greek alphabet. Because of its form, as either + or X, the Semitic Taw was also considered equivalent to the Greek Chi, which was written over the centuries both as + and X. The later and now more usual form of the Greek Chi was X, like the Latin X.

Note the "X's" in Margin of the Isaiah Scroll
Near the beginning of his work “On Weights and Measures,”Epiphanius lists a number of signs which are employed, he says, in manuscripts of the prophetic writings of the Bible. One of these signs is a cross-mark and appears in the Greek manuscripts of Epiphanius as +, and in the Syriac manuscripts of Epiphanius as X. In other words, it is precisely the cross-mark which we have described above, and which appears in the Isaiah Scroll from Qumran in the X-form, marking the passages listed. This sign, Epiphanius says, stands for the Messiah, the Christ, and is used to mark passages of messianic import."


I agree with David and after reading this I hope you will as well. Although I prefer to say "Merry Christmas" and most always will, for this post I do not have any qualms saying "Merry Xmas" to you and your families this Holy Day season!
God Bless  

Comments

WOOHOO!!
:)
PRAISE GOD FOR HIS REVELATION!! AMEN!!
Unknown said…
Awesome explanations, brother!

Popular posts from this blog

25 Reasons to Believe - In Jesus FREE EBOOK

FREE EBOOK click to download - When book comes up click down arrow on Upper Right to save a copy . A while back the Barna Group released a report titled, "Six Reasons Young Christians Leave Church." 1  Under reason two, " Teens’ and twenty-somethings’ experience of Christianity is shallow" they write:  "A second reason that young people depart church as young adults is that something is lacking in their experience of church. One-third said “church is boring” (31%). One-quarter of these young adults said that “faith is not relevant to my career or interests” (24%) or that “the Bible is not taught clearly or often enough” (23%). Sadly, one-fifth of these young adults who attended a church as a teenager said that “God seems missing from my experience of church” (20%)."  If one takes a look at the modern church-scape I can see why. The gap between those pastors and teachers that are fired up about Jesus and those that do not preach all of th

Fornication - The Acceptable Sin?

In the Bible there are several sexual sins that are categorized under the term,"Sexual Immorality." Not the least of these is, "Fornication." However fornication has become an outdated, and in many places, the acceptable sin in the late twentieth and twenty-first centuries. As a matter of fact, many do not even know what the term "fornication" means. Since the advent of the modern Bible translation, many have never heard of it. This article focuses on what the Scripture says about this out-of-control acceptable sin. Fornication is mentioned thirty-six times in the Bible (MT), thirty-two times in the New Testament. In almost all modern translations the word has been substituted with, "sexual immorality" and has come to mean any number of sexual sins. However, sin (missing the mark) is still sin and sin still separates a person from God. So why has this sin become so acceptable even in modern churches???? UPDATE : Here is a testimony of life

The Bride of Christ Has Made Herself Ready!!

The Bible teaches of an upcoming Wedding Day that the Church should be on cloud nine over!! Rev. 19:7-9 states: Let us be glad and rejoice and give Him glory, for the marriage of the Lamb has come , and His wife has made herself ready." And to her it was granted to be arrayed in fine linen, clean and bright, for the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints. Then he said to me, "Write: 'Blessed are those who are called to the marriage supper of the Lamb!' " And he said to me, "These are the true sayings of God." The passage above speaks of two distinct events, the Marriage of the Lamb and the Marriage Supper of the Lamb. Both of these events are reminiscent of the ancient Jewish wedding ceremony where the Bride would become betrothed to her Groom and he would go away to build her a home. In the meantime she would wait anxiously for his return with shouts from his wedding party of "The Bridegroom Comes!" When the shouts were he

Understanding Grace…without it no one can be saved!

Years ago as a pastor, I faced an issue concerning the topic of “Grace.” I had noticed some congregants who were taking Grace to the extreme and beginning to teach that since our sins were bought and paid for at the cross—all of them, past, present, and future—there was no need to strive against sin. Thanks to our Lord, this was noticed and the He quickly allowed it to be curbed. This heresy occasionally rears its head in Christian circles and indeed must be stopped before it becomes out-of-control. The good thing is that a proper understanding of Grace can arrest the heresy in its steps. Because this false perception thrives in loose living, many well-meaning Christians go completely to the opposite extreme and throw the Biblical teaching of “Grace” out altogether. That too is heresy. How should we approach it? Grace, as a doctrine, should always be presented in its entirety. By that I mean, a starting definition, followed by why it is important, and concluding with keeping it scri

Cardboard Signs and Saying Yes to God

Perhaps you have seen the story of "Daniel's Gloves". It has been floating around the internet since 2001 according to snopes.com. They also tell us the original author is Richard Ryan the assistant Pastor of a Church in Indiana.  I refer to this story—which you will find posted below mine—because of the effect that helping one in need can actually have on a believer’s life. One of the things I have done in the past is monitor just how many people there are who simply pass on by those who are holding a sign stating “Will work for food” or “Need Help for me and my children.” If you ask the hurting they will tell you there are literally hundreds and hundreds who just will not help. Truly it is a sad testimony that “one or a few bad apple(s) can spoil a whole bushel.” It is definitely something I also have observed. For some reason we either fear them, fear confrontation or fear being deceived. Whatever the reason, I often wonder how God feels about it. Just a fe